DP6 Activities



DP6 Blending and Online Teaching activities



“ 
The only person who is educated is the one who has learned how to learn and change.
 
- Rogers 
















To assist in understanding the concepts and research presented in this module, various activities of increasing demand and complexity are provided.

Level 1 (Quiz Activity)
Level 2  (Completion Activity)
Level 3  (Learning Activity)
Level 4 (Advanced Activity)
Level 5 (Research Activity)
Level 6 (RHD Activity)













Level 1 (Quiz Activity)



Blended and Online Teaching Quiz


You should study in detail the Blended and Online Teaching module before completing the quiz.


Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 5.00 - 4.25 4.24 -3.75 3.74 - 3.25 3.24 - 2.50  2.49 - 2.25 2.24 - 1.25         1.24 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%

85% of questions answered correctly.

75% of questions answered correctly.
 
65% of questions answered correctly.

50% of questions answered correctly.

45% of questions answered correctly. 

25% of questions answered correctly.

<25% of questions answered correctly. 

To complete your quiz go to the Learning@Griffith course website and the select DP6 Quiz.

You may only attempt a quiz once and the first six quizzes attempted will be used to determine their contribution to your Log of Learning Activities. 



Level 2 (Completion Activity)



Hangout Online


Run an online video conference session using Google+ Hangout with at least 5 participants. The session should be recorded and made publicly available on YouTube. It should:
  1. Has 5 participants
  2. Uses Google Hangout
  3. Use Hangouts on Air to record hangout to youtube
  4. All participants use video
  5. At least one Hangout App is used


Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 5.00 - 4.25 4.24 -3.75 3.74 - 3.25 3.24 - 2.50  2.49 - 2.25 2.24 - 1.25         1.24 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%

All five elements evidenced.

Four elements evidenced.
 
Three elements evidenced.

Two elements evidenced. 

One element evidenced. 

A partial element evidenced.

No element evidenced. 


To submit your completion activity, choose one of the Level 2 Completion Activity tasks on Learning@Griffith, and include a link to a public youtube recording of the Hangout when submitting your assignment. 



Level 3 (Learning Activity)



Inter-school Online Competition

Prepare an environment for students and teachers to organise and participate in an online competition on a topic/subject of your choice. (equivalent to 700 words).

You should aim to interpret how effective online competitions are conducted by existing organisations, analyse the necessary components of online competitions, design and develop websites (to promote and coordinate a competition) and databases (e.g. Google Forms and spreadsheets that would assist in the management of a competition), 
A satisfactory standard can be achieved by presenting a functional competition website, however High, Very High and Outstanding standards will not be achieved unless insight is shown into the management of online competitions. This will be assisted by reading deeply into the module text, examples, and further reading into the use of online tools to assist in competition management.

You can present your online competition via a website (equivalent to 700 words) that also include a page explaining your reasoning and the competition processes and management tools incorporated to assist in the effective running of an Inter-school Online Competition.

Your online competition will be assessed against the following criteria: 

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing the functional aspects of online competitions at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing  the functional aspects of online competitions at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the functional aspects of online competitions at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing  the functional aspects of online competitions at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing  the functional aspects of online competitions at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing I the functional aspects of online competitions at an unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing  the functional aspects of online competitions at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in determining successful aspects of online competitions at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in determining successful aspects of online competitions at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in determining successful aspects of online competitions at a good standard.Interpretive ability in determining successful aspects of online competitions at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in determining successful aspects of online competitions at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in determining successful aspects of online competitions at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in determining successful aspects of online competitions at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an online competition at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an online competition at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an online competition of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an online competition  of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an online competition of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an online competition of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an online competition  of significantly unsatisfactory quality.

To submit your learning activity, choose one of the Level 3 Learning Activity tasks on Learning@Griffith, place a link to your competition website into the comment section when submitting your assignment. Remember to ensure that you have made your website public.




Level 4 (Advanced Activity)



Educational Award


Prepare a submission for an educational award. (equivalent to 1100 words).

The submission should be completed as though you were eligible (i.e. a practicing classroom teacher) and can include realistically aspirational achievements you expect/intend to accomplish with your students in your first few years of teaching. At least some aspect of the submission must relate to innovation in the use of educational technologies and should address ICT integration into classroom practice, supporting student diversity, and engaging students in their learning.

Awards that could be developed for submission include:

Australian Awards for Outstanding Teaching and School Leadership
Peter Doherty Excellence in Science and Science Education Awards
Smart Classrooms ICT Teacher Awards
Microsoft Partners in Learning Application

It is not a requirement to submit for an award, nor is the award submission due date important.

Your submission will be assessed against the following criteria: 

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing and responding to award criteria at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in  analysing and responding to award criteria  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in  analysing and responding to award criteria at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in  analysing and responding to award criteria at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in  analysing and responding to award criteria at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in  analysing and responding to award criteria at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing and responding to award criteria at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in cintegrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an award submission of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an award submission of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an award submission of good quality. Articulation and presentation of an award submission of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an award submission of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an award submission of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an award submission of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.



To submit your Advanced Learning Activity, choose the Level 4 Learning Activity task on Learning@Griffith, then attach and submit your award submission as a PDF document.




Level 5 (Research Activity)







Level 6 (RHD Activity)



Comments