DP4 Activities



DP4 Mobile Learning Pedagogies activities



"If we teach today’s students as we taught yesterday’s, we rob them of tomorrow."

- Dewey









To assist in understanding the concepts and research presented in this module, various activities of increasing demand and complexity are provided.

Level 1 (Quiz Activity)
Level 2  (Completion Activity)
Level 3  (Learning Activity)
Level 4 (Advanced Activity)
Level 5 (Research Activity)
Level 6 (RHD Activity)












Level 1 (Quiz Activity)



Mobile Learning Pedagogies Quiz


You should study in detail the Mobile Learning Pedagogies module before completing the quiz.


Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 5.00 - 4.25 4.24 -3.75 3.74 - 3.25 3.24 - 2.50  2.49 - 2.25 2.24 - 1.25         1.24 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%

85% of questions answered correctly.

75% of questions answered correctly.
 
65% of questions answered correctly.

50% of questions answered correctly.

45% of questions answered correctly. 

25% of questions answered correctly.

<25% of questions answered correctly. 

To complete your quiz go to the Learning@Griffith course website and the select Dp4 Quiz.

You may only attempt a quiz once and the first six quizzes attempted will be used to determine their contribution to your Log of Learning Activities. 



Level 2 (Completion Activity)



Location Based Learning activity


Identify an app, program or website to support a location based learning activity.  It should:
  1. be clearly applicable to education;
  2. include a short (less than 200 words) description of how it could be used for mobile learning;
  3. require mobile activity - i.e. moving between physical locations;
  4. be contextualised to local locations; and
  5. include the us of mobile technologies.


Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 5.00 - 4.25 4.24 -3.75 3.74 - 3.25 3.24 - 2.50  2.49 - 2.25 2.24 - 1.25         1.24 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%

All five elements evidenced.

Four elements evidenced.
 
Three elements evidenced.

Two elements evidenced. 

One element evidenced. 

A partial element evidenced.

No element evidenced. 


To submit your completion activity, choose one of the Level 2 Completion Activity tasks on Learning@Griffith, and include a link to your shared Google document when submitting your assignment. 



Level 3 (Learning Activity)



Argument for or against 1:1 or BYOD

Prepare an argument for or against either 1:1 or BYOD initiatives. (equivalent to 700 words).

You should aim to research and interpret the debate on the issue and present a reasoned argument supported by fact for or against the concept.
A satisfactory standard can be achieved by summarising available viewpoints, however High, Very High and Outstanding standards will not be achieved unless insight is shown into why the argument has arisen  the perspective for and against, and an effective argument presented that on balance favours one viewpoint. This will be assisted by reading deeply into the module text, examples, and further reading into the issues involved.

You can present your argument via a shared Google document (equivalent to 700 words).

Your argument will be assessed against the following criteria: 

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing the issue at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the issue at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the issue at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing the issue at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing the issue at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing the issue at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing the issue at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an argument at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an argument of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of significantly unsatisfactory quality.

To submit your learning activity, choose one of the Level 3 Learning Activity tasks on Learning@Griffith, place a link to your shared Google document into the comment section when submitting your assignment. Remember to ensure that you have made your document public.




Level 4 (Advanced Activity)



Educational App


Create an education app for use on mobile devices and submit a narrated screen recording demonstrating the educational uses of your app (no more than 11 minutes long).

While there are many ways to build mobile applications (apps), you can use web based tools such as Theappbuilder, Appypie, Buzztouch, and many others, to greatly simplify the process. Publishing to a service such as the Apple or Google app store is not required, you can create your app on your computer and demonstrate its functionality through screen recording software of the app working in the development environment. 

Your app will be assessed against the following criteria: 

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing app building software to develop an educational app at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app   in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in iachieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in ideveloping a mobile app at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to ngage and challenge students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an educational app of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of good quality. Articulation and presentation of an educational app of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.



To submit your Advanced Learning Activity, choose the Level 4 Learning Activity task on Learning@Griffith, then submit a link to your narrated screen recording as a public youtube video.




Level 5 (Research Activity)







Level 6 (RHD Activity)




Comments