DP3 Activities





DP3 Learning Analytics




“In God we trust. All others must bring data.” 
- Deming 













To assist in understanding the concepts and research presented in this module, various activities of increasing demand and complexity are provided.

Level 1 (Quiz Activity)
Level 2  (Completion Activity)
Level 3  (Learning Activity)
Level 4 (Advanced Activity)
Level 5 (Research Activity)
Level 6 (RHD Activity)





Level 1 (Quiz Activity)



Learning Analytics Quiz


You should study in detail the Learning Analytics module before completing the quiz.


Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 5.00 - 4.25 4.24 -3.75 3.74 - 3.25 3.24 - 2.50  2.49 - 2.25 2.24 - 1.25         1.24 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%

85% of questions answered correctly.

75% of questions answered correctly.
 
65% of questions answered correctly.

50% of questions answered correctly.

45% of questions answered correctly. 

25% of questions answered correctly.

<25% of questions answered correctly. 

To complete your quiz go to the Learning@Griffith course website and the select DP3 Quiz.

You may only attempt a quiz once and the first six quizzes attempted will be used to determine their contribution to your Log of Learning Activities. 



Level 2 (Completion Activity)



Infographic


Create a PDF infographic for an education technology or digital pedagogy concept.  It should include:
  1. Text;
  2. Images;
  3. Graphs;
  4. A background or decoration, and
  5. A balance of elements.


Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 5.00 - 4.25 4.24 -3.75 3.74 - 3.25 3.24 - 2.50  2.49 - 2.25 2.24 - 1.25         1.24 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%

All five elements evidenced.

Four elements evidenced.
 
Three elements evidenced.

Two elements evidenced. 

One element evidenced. 

A partial element evidenced.

No element evidenced. 


To submit your completion activity, choose one of the Level 2 Completion Activity tasks on Learning@Griffith, and attach your Infographic PDF, JPG or submit a link to your public online infographic when submitting your assignment. 



Level 3 (Learning Activity)



Online test

Prepare an online test on a topic related to your course (equivalent to 700 words).

You should aim to interpret course material to derive appropriate concepts that can be tested effectively in an online testing environment.

A satisfactory standard can be achieved by a test of 25 multiple choice questions on any aspect of this course with an explanation of why the test questions were ordered and constructed in the way chosen, however High, Very High and Outstanding standards will not be achieved unless insight is shown into the analysis and use of non-multiple choice questions and applying their use to assess particular concepts. This will be assisted by reading deeply into the module text, examples, and further reading into the many types of online quiz systems available such as makeaquiz, quizstar, Classmarker, etc.

You can present your quiz online accompanied by a shared Google document explaining your quiz decisions - making both your shared Google document and the online quiz publicly available and providing a link to each (equivalent to 700 words).

Your quiz will be assessed against the following criteria: 

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing quiz making technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability quiz making  ICT technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing quiz making  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a quiz at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of a quiz of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of significantly unsatisfactory quality.

To submit your learning activity, choose one of the Level 3 Learning Activity tasks on Learning@Griffith, place a link to your quiz and shared Google document into the comment section when submitting your assignment. Remember to ensure that you have made your quiz and shared document public.




Level 4 (Advanced Activity)



Student Data Analysis


Conduct an analysis of the provided student data using analysis software (equivalent to 1100 words).

Using the SunLANDER test analysis software (you will need to become familiar with the sunLANDER user guide) and the sample data set, conduct an analysis of this data to inform teachers at the sample school for ONE of the Year levels: 3, 5, 7 and 9.  Your advice should be directed at teachers to improve student learning but all advice must be supported by evidence drawn from the test analysis. Your analysis should be supported by tables and graphs to assist in explaining the data.

Your article will be assessed against the following criteria: 

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in using the sunLANDER tool  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability using the sunLANDER tool  in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in  using the sunLANDER tool  in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in  using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher  audience at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data  at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data  at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data  at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of the analysis of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of good quality. Articulation and presentation of the analysis of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.



To submit your Advanced Learning Activity, choose the Level 4 Learning Activity task on Learning@Griffith, then attach and submit your analysis as a PDF document or as a link to a shared Google document.




Level 5 (Research Activity)







Level 6 (RHD Activity)




Comments