Computational thinking is a fundamental skill for everyone, not just for computer scientists. To reading, writing, and arithmetic, we should add computational thinking to every child’s analytical ability.
Computational Thinking develops in students the capacity to view problems and opportunities as challenges that can be solved through the application of their understanding of digital technologies.
Computational Thinking involves the development of a range of Digital Technology processes and skills that allow students to understand problems and create solutions that would not be possible without the perspective provided by Computational Thinking.
While Computational Thinking as a concept has been available for many decades, the widespread development of Computation Thinking in all students at all years levels is very new, and how best to develop such thinking and its associated skills will continue to evolve as the Technologies learning area is implemented in Australian classrooms.Computational thinking is a problem-solving method that is applied to create solutions that can be implemented using digital technologies. It involves integrating strategies, such as organising data logically, breaking down problems into parts, interpreting patterns and models and designing and implementing algorithms.
Computational thinking is used when specifying and implementing algorithmic solutions to problems in Digital Technologies. For a computer to be able to process data through a series of logical and ordered steps, students must be able to take an abstract idea and break it down into defined, simple tasks that produce an outcome. This may include analysing trends in data, responding to user input under certain preconditions or predicting the outcome of a simulation.
This type of thinking is used in Design and Technologies during different phases of a design process when computation is needed to quantify data and solve problems. Examples include when calculating costs, testing materials and components, comparing performance, or modelling trends.
In the 60's and 70's Seymour Papert introduced computers into the classroom for the purpose of developing student thinking in different ways, developing this into the concept of Procedural Thinking, and incorporating it into the learning theory of contructivism. In the decades since, computer education veered off into learning about the technologies themselves - software, hardware and networks, and lost focus on developing student understanding of the world and technologies place within it. Papert focused on giving students agency over technology, being in control of technologies to serve their interests and curiosity, rather than passive user of what others have created. Digital Technologies aims to re-engage students and teachers with understanding technologies so that they can manipulate and control technology for their own purposes in creative and innovative ways.
Computational Thinking (CT) is a way of viewing problems and opportunities using computer science techniques that provide a perspective to understand the underlying algorithms and computations involved. The term computational thinking was first used by Seymour Papert in 1996 and made popular by Jeannette Wing in 2006.
Computational Thinking is a problem-solving process that includes the following characteristics:
Computational thinking (CT) also involves a set of problem-solving skills and techniques that software engineers use to write programs that underlie the computer applications.
Jannette Wing (2006) reconceptualised Computational Thinking as the new fundamental thinking skill for all students and teachers. Where reading and writing became universally fundamental with the technological development of the printing press, Computational Thinking arrises from the transformational technology of the computer and information networks. Computational thinking involves solving problems, designing systems, and understanding human behavior using mental processes, tools and perspectives developed from across the fields of computing.
Computational Thinking provides a new way of thinking about solving problems and developing opportunities. Computational Thinking involves reformulating seemingly difficult problems into ones we know how to solve, by reduction, embedding, transformation, or simulation.
For those uneducated in Computational Thinking, the concepts and terminology can appear as complex and difficult as learning Mathematics or the Scientific Method for the fist time. The skills and processes involved in Computational Thinking have to be applied and contextualised to reach the point in which it is possible to think computationally. This is primarily done through problem solving activities that gradually build to enable increasing complex Computational Thinking concepts to be applied from a growing set of techniques and process.
What is Computational Thinking
Computational Thinking is using abstraction and decomposition when attacking a large complex tasks or designing large complex systems. It is choosing an appropriate representation for a problem or modelling it to make a problem easier to understand and solve. It is having the confidence to safely use, modify, and influence large complex systems without understanding their every detail. Computational Thinking is thinking in terms of prevention, protection, and recovery from worst-case scenarios through redundancy, damage containment, and error correction. Computational thinking is using heuristic reasoning (experience-based techniques such as common sense) to discover a solution. It is planning, learning, and scheduling in the presence of uncertainty. Computational Thinking is using massive amounts of data to speed up computation, making trade-offs between time and space, between processing power and storage capacity.
When a student goes to school in the morning, they put in their backpack the things they need for the day; that uses a computational process of prefetching and caching. When a student loses their hat and you suggest they retrace their steps; this is an example of the computational process of backtracking. At what point do you stop renting a DVD and buy yourself a copy?; an example of an online algorithms. Which line do you stand in at the supermarket?; an example of performance modelling.. Why does your landline telephone still work during a power outage?; an example of independence of failure and redundancy in design. How do Completely Automated Public Turing Test(s) to Tell Computers and Humans Apart, or CAPTCHAs, authenticate humans?; that exploits the difficulty of solving hard Artificial Intelligence problems to foil computing agents.
Computational thinking will have become ingrained in everyone’s lives when words such as algorithm and precondition are part of everyone’s vocabulary; when nondeterminism and garbage collection take on the meanings used by computer scientists; and when trees are drawn upside down.
Ubiquitous computing, where everyone uses a computing device (desktops, laptops, tablets, mobiles) for every conceivable task, is now realised. Ubiquitous computing was yesterday’s dream that has become today’s reality; computational thinking is tomorrow’s reality.
Computational Thinking has the following characteristics:
Digital Technologies is not just about computer programming. Thinking computationally means more than being able to program a computer. It requires thinking at multiple levels of abstraction;
A fundamental skill is something every human being must know to function in modern society. Rote means a mechanical routine;
Computational thinking is a way humans solve problems; it is not trying to get humans to think like computers. Computers can be dull and boring; humans are clever and imaginative. We humans make computers exciting. Equipped with computing devices, we use our cleverness to tackle problems we would not dare take on before the age of computing and build systems with functionality limited only by our imaginations;
Digital Technologies inherently draws on Mathematical Thinking, given that, like all sciences, its formal foundations rest on mathematics. Digital Technologies inherently draws on Design Thinking, given that students build systems that interact with the real world. The constraints of the underlying computing device force students to think computationally, not just mathematically, however being free to build virtual worlds enables them to engineer systems beyond the physical world;
It’s not just the software and hardware artefacts students produce that will be physically present everywhere and touch our lives all the time, it will be the computational concepts we use to approach and solve problems, manage our daily lives, and communicate and interact with other people; and
Computational thinking will be a reality when it is so integral to human endeavours it disappears as an explicit philosophy. Some people equate Digital Technologies just with computer programming. Some parents see only a narrow range of job opportunities for their children who major in Digital Technologies. Many people think the fundamental research in Digital Technologies is complete and that only the engineering remains. Computational Thinking is a grand vision to guide Digital Technologies educators, researchers, and practitioners as society’s image of the field changes, especially through the Technologies learning area, sending two main messages:
Students can study the English or Mathematics learning areas and go on to a multitude of different careers. The same for Digital Technologies. Students can study Digital Technologies and go on to careers in medicine, law, business, politics, any type of science or engineering, and the arts.
The study of Digital Technologies should be seen as an intellectual adventure, exploring the joy, awe, and power of digital technologies; improving the world through innovations, problem solving, and creative works; achieved through the power of Computational Thinking.
Computation is everywhere. From search engines that help us find information, to cash registers in stores, to software used for designing bridges, we live in a world built on the effects of computation.
Computation is not just another word for technology. For example, a cellular phone contains many different technologies: a radio transmitter and receiver, a processor, memory, and electro-mechnical parts like buttons and touch screens. When studying the effects of computation, we aren’t trying to learn how physics governs these technologies. Analyzing the effects of computation means specifically looking at what happens when we collect, store, and process data.
The computation done by a cell phone involves recording your voice as data, compressing and transmitting that data, and interacting with a larger system that routes your call’s data to its destination. This same computational process is done in reverse so your conversation partner can talk back to you. That sounds like a lot of computational work for your cell phone to do, but that’s only part of what happens when you make a call.
All the sending and receiving of data happens via radio waves. When the technology for radio communication was first invented by Nikola Tesla, it could only be used for mass communication in the form of broadcasts. It takes computation to transform that raw technological capacity into the more refined form we use today in our cell phones. One effect of computation is that radio can now be used for person-to-person communication, with many simultaneous conversations happening in the same physical area.
When we analyze the effects of computation, we take note of data is transformed. We look at how information is processed and what is accomplished by that processing. We can think about what we might do if such computational power wasn’t available. That can also help us start to imagine new things we can strive to accomplish using computation.
A major part of the work in analysing the effects of computation is careful observation, as Blaze, Ada, Charles, Alan, and Grace are doing in this illustration. In their world, as in ours, computation is everywhere. By looking closely, we can start to see what computation — not just raw technology — does for us.
In this illustration, the characters are building, testing, and exploring computational artefacts. The process of creating is not limited to only thinking of ideas, or just assembling parts. The machines you see in these cartoons are symbolic, designed to be open to interpretation and imagination. Here are some ways of looking at them to help you get started:
Grace is building something new. At the moment, she’s using a wrench because it’s the right tool for the work she’s doing. She’s not just using a machine built by someone else; she’s actually making something new herself. Sometimes, creating things is a time-consuming and difficult process, but it gets easier with experience.
Blaze is wearing a glove that controls a much larger and stronger hand. This hand can do many things, including lift up Blaze himself. Blaze’s glove is a metaphor for computational artefacts that allow us to harness the power of machines to carry out massive calculations. When we turn that power back upon itself as we do when we use recursion, higher-order functions, or write a compiler for a language in that same language, things can get very exciting.
Alan is walking on the ceiling. He’s holding a Möbius strip, a topological surface with only one side. When twisted and attached back to itself, a regular flat rectangle can be transformed into a Möbius strip. Using computational thinking, we can change our perspective to solve a complex problem — like Alan, who is upside down! Many computational concepts, like the idea of the Möbius strip, can challenge our assumptions about what’s possible and reveal deeper truths about the properties of the systems we are using or creating. At first this can seem as difficult as walking on the ceiling, but after a while you’ll probably find it fun.
Charles is holding an orb covered in what look like small radio dishes. Computational artefacts need not be designed to work in isolation. They can work together and communicate to accomplish a task, like we see in multi-core processors or parallel computing. Perhaps the radio dishes are helping Charles to hear things that other characters can not. Similarly, algorithms for pattern recognition, signal processing, error correction, and noise reduction enhance our ability to extract information from data. With the help of computational artefacts, we gain new powers.
“All models are wrong, but some are useful.”
One meaning of the word model is: A smaller or simpler version of the original item. The model could be a physical object like the small robot in this illustration. Notice that Blaze isn’t trying to move the arms of the huge robot, nor trying to move the heavy blocks himself. Instead, he is working with a model robot small enough for him to literally put his own hands around. This is simplifies the physical work he needs to do, just like a simplified model of an idea makes thinking easier.
For example, classical mechanics is a model: It’s Newton’s easily-computed approximation of the more complex reality of motion. In computer science, we make a model every time we write a program. We must choose the information and level of detail represented in our program. Some details must be left out. If we tried to include everything in a model or program, we would end up simulating the whole world!
In a complex system, we might use many different models and make them work together. We might not even care if one part of the system was switched out for something else that can accomplish the same goal. We could say we’ve abstracted that part of the system. Carefully selecting the qualities we care about and ignoring the rest of the details is the key to abstraction. When we deliberately separate our system into parts that can be individually understood, tested, reused, and substituted, then we are creating new abstractions.
“Analysis is the process of breaking a complex topic or substance into smaller parts to gain a better understanding of it.”
In this illustration, Ada is using a tool with many attachments, representing the idea that we often need to try multiple approaches and many different tools before we can “crack” a problem. Different problems and different approaches to these problems have different strengths. Often, we can’t solve a problem until we try a number of different ways to break it down. That’s why it’s so valuable to have a variety of conceptual tools available when working on a problem.
Over to the right, Alan is controlling a zoomed-in view of the cubes on the table. This allows him to see and understand not only how a cube looks and acts from the outside, but to how its internal workings contribute to its overall behaviour. Programmers engage in this kind of analysis when they use a debugger; so do electrical engineers when they use an oscilloscope to visualise signals.
Very rarely is a computational artefact self-explanatory. A CPU made of microscopic transistors on silicon or a compiled binary program of 1’s and 0’s are both quite difficult to understand. Their forms are optimised for computational performance, not human comprehension. The design plan for the CPU or the source code of the program are more easily understood. But even these precursors don’t necessarily explain how they were made or why they work.
Computational thinking requires us to discuss processes for both people and machines to follow, and how these processes are intended to lead to specific results. For example, when a programmer is learning how to write programs, they need to be taught to debug by printing the value of a variable. When you discover a new mathematical technique for manipulating 3d shapes efficiently, you have to write it up so other people can understand and use it. Communication is the way we bring the things we know into the world.
When we use computation to solve a problem, the answer we get isn’t automatically meaningful to others. We have to communicate this result in a way that reveals both its importance and its origin.
In the illustration, Charles is capturing the sounds of a parrot in the wild and transmitting them to Grace at another location. We can interpret this literally as communication of audio data, like someone’s voice on a phone call. However, to another parrot perhaps the parrot’s song represents a process (like a technique for finding fruits and seeds, or a plan for timing seasonal migration) or some important news (such as the winner of the annual parrot speechmaking contest). Communicating about processes and results allows us to benefit from insights gained by other computational thinkers.
To make teamwork effective, individuals need interpersonal and communication skills as well as knowledge of different team methodologies and processes. As teams grow in size, the role of culture and management becomes increasingly important. Teamwork, like any other skill, takes practice.
Various strategies for dividing up work have different strengths and weaknesses. Figuring out the best way to work together isn’t always easy, but it’s important for computational thinking.
As multi-core processors and distributed computing become more common, we see computers themselves working in teams. Most web sites that you visit are served from data centres, where hundreds or thousands of individual computers work together to accomplish amazing tasks. We humans can do the same!
In this illustration, Ada, Alan, and Grace are each taking apart some of the machines we have seen in other scenes. But decomposition isn’t only about disassembling objects. It’s also about pulling apart the steps of a process. Some things that we think of as a single action are actually a composite of many smaller actions. For example we may say that we are going to make dinner. But when we apply decomposition, we find that making dinner actually means to opening the refrigerator, getting out the broccoli, cutting up an onion, turning on the stove, and many other small steps.
Decomposition is the ability to break down a task into minute details so that we can clearly explain a process to another person or to a computer, or even to just write notes for ourselves. Decomposing a problem frequently leads to pattern recognition and generalization, and thus the ability to design an algorithm.
1. When we taste an unfamiliar dish and identify several ingredients based on the flavor, we are decomposing that dish into its individual ingredients.
2. When we give someone directions to our house, we are decomposing the process of getting from one place to another.
3. In mathematics, we can decompose a number such as 256.37 as follows: 2*102+5*101+6*100+3*10-1+7*10-2
4. In mathematics, we can decompose any numbers such as 20, 24, and 28 into their prime factors to help us find their least common multiple:
◦ 20: 2*2*5
◦ 24: 2*2*2*3
◦ 28: 2*2*7
◦ LCM: 2*2*2*5*3*7 = 840
A difficult computational problem can sometimes be solved by thinking of the overall task as being made up of many smaller, simpler tasks. Decomposition involves identifying those smaller tasks and how they fit together. The more times you do this, the easier it gets. Just ask Ada, who is taking apart an orb. Even though each of the orbs is a little different, she has a pretty good idea of what pieces she’s going to find when she takes one apart.
Pattern Recognition is the ability to notice similarities or common differences that will help us make predictions or lead us to shortcuts. Pattern recognition is frequently the basis for solving problems and designing algorithms.
In mathematics, when calculating the largest area possible for a rectangle of a given perimeter, we can guess and see patterns in the length, width, and area such as:
These patterns lead us to the conclusion that the rectangle with the greatest area is a square.
There’s something strange about the pattern of blocks, and Grace is pointing it out to Ada. Although they aren’t looking at the whole complicated machine that produces this pattern of blocks, they can still identify what is unusual. This doesn’t mean anything is wrong, but it tells them that there might be more going on than they first thought.
Forming an idea of what you expect is one way to find patterns. The more you look, the more patterns you will find in nature, in computational artefacts, and in processes. When we recognise a pattern, we can use our other computational thinking skills to help us understand its importance.
After you’ve seen the same pattern a few times, you might start thinking of different ways to describe it. Alan is watching some blocks fall into place to form a picture. If the machines drop the same pattern of blocks again, they’ll make the same picture.
There’s a lot for Alan to think about here, watching the blocks fall. There lots of possible patterns — see if you can calculate the number. There are also a lot of ways to describe these patterns.
If we wanted the machines to make a picture of a house with the door on the right side instead of the left side, the instructions would be almost the same. What if instead of giving the machines new instructions every time, we simply told them what to change about some other instructions? We would need instructions that describe how to change other instructions.
Thinking this way is some of the work we do when we try to generalise patterns. We look for what’s the same about a group of patterns and try to describe it them a way that’s both clear and efficient. If we can describe the group of patterns all at once, a pattern of patterns, then we have an abstraction.
Pattern Generalisation and Abstraction is the ability to filter out information that is not necessary to solve a certain type of problem and generalise the information that is necessary. Pattern generalisation and abstraction allows us to represent an idea or a process in general terms (e.g., variables) so that we can use it to solve other problems that are similar in nature.
It’s a computational thinking dance party! The special dance floor in this illustration might be recording their steps, or it might be lighting up with dance instructions. But whileGrace, Alan, and Ada are dancing away, Charles is actually designing a new dance. Like an algorithm, a dance is a set of steps that can be followed by others to get the same result.
Sometimes we think of algorithms as being written down like a computer program, but an algorithm is more like an idea. The same algorithm can be written in many different computer languages. It’s the steps in the process that make an algorithm what it is.
In order to design an algorithm, or a dance, you need to understand your goal. You also need to understand the constraints of the system. Humans only have two feet, so a dance designed for humans has to work with that limitation. Computational systems have different kinds of limitations, such as the speed of the processors or the size of the memory or the amount of electricity they consume. Designing an algorithm that accomplishes specific goal within the constraints of the system is like creating an elegant dance that everyone else wants to learn.
Algorithm Design is the ability to develop a step-by-step strategy for solving a problem. Algorithm design is often based on the decomposition of a problem and the identification of patterns that help to solve the problem. In computer science as well as in mathematics, algorithms are often written abstractly, utilising variables in place of specific numbers.
We can take this a step further and implement this algorithm in the Python programming language to have the computer calculate this for us:
The following is not included in the course quizzes
Tools for drawing flow charts, making app mockups, etc.
Discussion: What is computational thinking? How can such thinking be developed?
Activity: Unplugged activities
This activity uses some intriguing variations on the game of 20 questions to demonstrate how we can quantify information content, which in turn shows us how to store and share it efficiently.
Discussion: what computational thinking skills could be developed through the activity.
This activity shows a surprising technique discovered by computer scientists that seems impossible; it allows people to share personal certain kinds of information accurately without having to give up any privacy at all.
Discussion: what computational thinking skills could be developed through the activity.
Activity: Beebots, and the Beebot App
First have students in pairs, give instruction to move about the room with their eye's closed.
Introduce the Bee Bots but before using them, have the students complete the Bee Bot App activities as quickly as they can
Then students should use the Bee Bots on the various maps.
Discussion: 1. what other learning areas could be integrated, and 2. what computational thinking skills could be developed.
Extension Activity: Try some starter projects
Discussion: what computational thinking skills could be developed.
Discussion: Real world system problem solutions using MakeyMakey and Scratch
More MakeyMakey examples