Criteria

Portfolio of Learning activities are assessed according to the task description in your course guide and the following activity specific criteria. Some activities use three criteria points, others use 5 criteria points, depending on the nature of the responses required by the activity, but all are worth the same towards the overall criteria of your Portfolio of Learning and associated mark.


Digital Portfolio Template


Create an eportfolio shell (equivalent to 700 words) in Google Sites that demonstrate your mastery of a range of ICT’s and your 
ability to use help files and tutorials. This portfolio can be used for further courses in which you may be required to present 
your achievements in a digital portfolio, for job applications, or teacher annual performance reviews. You do NOT need to include 
in your portfolio examples of your work, only to create a shell that could be developed for this purpose. The focus of this learning 
activity is to show you can learn new ICT skills, and demonstrate your capacity to integrate a range of ICT's into a coherent whole 
for a specific purpose.

• Create a website in Google SItes;

• Personalise your site to make it distinct (changing colours, fonts, etc.) to produce a cohesive theme to your site. While 
you can start with a template you should modify this if you do;

• On this site have at least three pages including an introductory page that has navigation tools (see below) and 
information about/introducing yourself and your eportfolio ( NewPage > Template > WebPage );


• On the first page, include a listing that shows your other pages (Insert > Sub-pages);

• Define headings and subheadings on your pages (Format);

• On each page, include a ‘table of contents’ that shows your headings and subheadings (Insert Table of contents);

• Include links to other websites via textual hyperlinks (Insert > Link);

• Include at least one image that you have permission to use (e.g. is found using an advanced Google image search with usage rights set to 'free to use or share' or has a Creative Commons share alike attribution) and acknowledge this with the name of the creator and link to the source of the image (Insert > Image);

• Include a link to another website via an image hyperlink when clicking on the image (Insert > Link);

• Upload a file (e.g. a PDF document) that can be accessed from your portfolio (New Page > Template > File Cabinet);

• Create a short video introducing yourself, edit it, make it public, upload it to youtube, and embed this on your site (Insert > Video > Youtube); (no more than 1 minute long)

• Create an introductory form (using Google Forms) asking visitors at least three questions and embed this in your portfolio (Insert > Spreadsheet Form);

  Create a calendar with at least 3 events during March of this year and embed this on your site (Insert > Calendar);

• Create a document in Google Docs and embed this on your site (Insert > Document);

• Create a short (3-5 slides or parts) Presentation (PPT/Keynote uploaded to Slideshare, Google Slides, Slide Rocket, or Prezi) and embed this on your site (Insert > Presentation or embedding HTML);

• Modify or create an image that reflects your interests in educational technologies, can be used as a banner on top of your site, and place this on your site (Insert > Image);

• Create a blog (in blogger or other blog service), write at least three posts, and embed an RSS stream from your blog into 
your site (Recent Posts); 

• Set website  permissions to ensure that it is publicly accessible; and

• For one of your pages, change the page permissions so that only you can access this page (Sharing and Permissions). Place an obvious link to this private page on a public section of your site.


You should aim to interpret what can be accomplished in each of the above task elements by examining the Google Sites help files, youtube and online tutorials; analysing what can be done with each element to support a digital portfolio; and presenting a website as a professional digital portfolio. A satisfactory standard can be achieved by effective inclusion of at least half of the detailed elements into your digital portfolio shell, however High, Very High and Outstanding standards will not be achieved by just including more elements, at these standards you will need to show insight into the effective use, an integration of ICT elements to form a portfolio greater than its parts,  and effective presentation of your digital portfolio. At these levels you would be expected to derive further understanding from the set readings, examples, and further reading into the concept of digital portfolios and educational technologies in general. You do not however need to include additional elements beyond that indicated in the above points.

Your digital portfolio shell will be assessed against the following criteria: 

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in completing all ICT tasks at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in completing almost all ICT tasks at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in completing most ICT tasks at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in completing most ICT tasks at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in completing most ICT tasks at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in completing some ICT tasks even at aunsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in completing few ICT tasks and at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating an ICT task in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.

Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  tasks in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT tasks in meaningful ways  at good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT tasks in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT tasks in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  tasks in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in cintegrating ICT tasks in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a portfolio at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a portfolio at very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a portfolio of good quality. Articulation and presentation of a portfolio of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of portfolio of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of portfolio of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of portfolio of significantly unsatisfactory quality.


To submit your learning activity, selected 'Assessment" on Learning@Griffith, select 'Portfolio of Learning', then select "Portfolio of Learning Item 1: Digital Portfolio Template", then place a hyperlink to your digital portfolio into the comment section when submitting your assignment. Remember to ensure that you have made your website public.




Present a PD session


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing ICT technologies at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in cintegrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a professional development session of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of  a professional development session of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of  a professional development session of good quality. Articulation and presentation of  a professional development session of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of  a professional development session of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of  a professional development session of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of  a professional development session of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.



TPACK Analysis 


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing ICT technologies at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an analysis at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an analysis of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of significantly unsatisfactory quality.

SAMR series


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing ICT technologies at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an analysis at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an analysis of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an analysis of significantly unsatisfactory quality.



Online test


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing quiz making technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing quiz making  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability quiz making  ICT technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing quiz making  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating online quizzes into the curriculum in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a quiz at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of a quiz of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a quiz of significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Student Data Analysis

Using the SunLANDER test analysis software (you will need to become familiar with the sunLANDER user guide) and the sample data set

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing test data  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in using the sunLANDER tool  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability using the sunLANDER tool  in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in  using the sunLANDER tool  in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in  using the sunLANDER tool in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher  audience at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in explaining your data analysis for a teacher audience at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data  at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data  at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data  at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using tables and graphs to explain the data at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of the analysis of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of good quality. Articulation and presentation of the analysis of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of the analysis of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.



Journal Article


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing ICT technologies at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in cintegrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an article of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an article of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an article of good quality. Articulation and presentation of an article of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an article of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an article of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an article of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.



Argument for or against 1:1 or BYOD

 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing the issue at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the issue at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the issue at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing the issue at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing the issue at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing the issue at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing the issue at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in considering different perspectives in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an argument at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an argument of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an argument  of significantly unsatisfactory quality.

Educational App


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing app building software to develop an educational app at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing app building software to develop an educational app at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app   in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in iachieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in achieving an educational outcome through an app in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in developing a mobile app at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in ideveloping a mobile app at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to ngage and challenge students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using an app to engage and challenge students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an educational app of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of good quality. Articulation and presentation of an educational app of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational app of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.


MOOCS


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing the emergence of MOOCs at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the emergence of MOOCs  at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing  the emergence of MOOCs  t a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing the concept of a MOOC  at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing the concept of a MOOC at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing the concept of a MOOC at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing the concept of a MOOC at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in comparing the Types of MOOCs and educational implications at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in comparing the Types of MOOCs and educational implications at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in comparing the Types of MOOCs and educational implications at a good standard.Interpretive ability in exploring the educational implications at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in exploring the educational implications at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in exploring the educational implications at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in exploring the educational implications at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an analytical essay at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an analytical essay at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an analytical essay of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an analytical essay of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an analytical essay of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an analytical essay of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an analytical essay of significantly unsatisfactory quality.



Setup your own LMS


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing what is educationally possible when using a LMS at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing what is educationally possible when using a LMS  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysingwhat is educationally possible when using a LMS  at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing what is educationally possible when using a LMS  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing what is educationally possible when using a LMS  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing what is educationally possible when using a LMS at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing what is educationally possible when using a LMS  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in demonstrating the educational use of a LMS  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in demonstrating the educational use of a LMS   in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in demonstrating the educational use of a LMS in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in demonstrating the educational use of a LMS  in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in demonstrating the educational use of a LMS in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in demonstrating the educational use of a LMS   in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in demonstrating the educational use of a LMS  in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in applying LMS tools and functionality  at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in applying LMS tools and functionality  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in applying LMS tools and functionality  at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in applying LMS tools and functionality  at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in applying LMS tools and functionality  at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in applying LMS tools and functionality  at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in applying LMS tools and functionality  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using an LMS to  engage and challenge students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using an LMS to engage and challenge students  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using an LMS to  engage and challenge students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using an LMS to engage and challenge students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using an LMS to  engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using an LMS to  engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using an LMS to  engage and challenge students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an LMS and screen recording of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an LMS and screen recording of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an LMS and screen recording of good quality. Articulation and presentation of an LMS and screen recording of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an LMS and screen recording of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an LMS and screen recording of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an LMS and screen recording of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Create a video tutorial 


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing and demonstrating the effective use of video for instruction at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing and demonstrating the effective use of video for instruction  at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing and demonstrating the effective use of video for instruction  at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing and demonstrating the effective use of video for instruction  at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing and demonstrating the effective use of video for instruction at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in the effective use of video for instruction at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability in  the effective use of video for instruction at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in explaining a concept using video in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in explaining a concept using video in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in explaining a concept using video in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in explaining a concept using video in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in explaining a concept using video in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in explaining a concept using video in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in explaining a concept using video in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an instructional video at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an instructional video at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an instructional video of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an instructional video of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an instructional video of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an instructional video of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an instructional video of significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Digital Book


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing ICT technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing ICT technologies at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT into the curriculum in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating ICT  in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in cintegrating ICT in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in integrating ICT for a diversity of students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using ICT to engage and challenge students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a digital book at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital book at a very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital bookof a good quality. Articulation and presentation of a digital book of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital book of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of a digital book of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital book of significantly unsatisfactory quality.



Minecraft or Portal educational activity


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing the game environment at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing  the game environment at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing  the game environment at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing  the game environment at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing the game environment at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing  the game environment at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing the game environment at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability and research into educational application of the environment at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability  and research into educational application  at a very high standard.Interpretive ability  and research into educational application of the environment  at a good standard.Interpretive ability  and research into educational application of the environment at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability  and research into educational application of the environment at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability  and research into educational application of the environment  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability  and research into educational application of the environment at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of the educational use of the environment at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of the educational use of the environment  at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of the educational use of the environment of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of the educational use of the environment  of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation ofthe educational use of the environment of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation the educational use of the environment  of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of the educational use of the environment of significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Educational Game


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing game development engine options at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing game development engine options at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing game development engine options at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing game development engine options at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing game development engine options at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing game development engine options at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing game development engine options  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating gameplay techniques at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating gameplay techniques  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating gameplay techniques at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in gameplay techniques in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating gameplay techniques at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in integrating gameplay techniques at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in cintegrating gameplay techniques at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using a game to achieve an educational outcome at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using a game to achieve an educational outcome at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using a game to achieve an educational outcome at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using a game to achieve an educational outcome at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using a game to achieve an educational outcome at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using a game to achieve an educational outcome at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using a game to achieve an educational outcome at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a game of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a game of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a game of good quality. Articulation and presentation of a game of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of a game of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of a game of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a game of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.




Create a QR Code Educational Activity


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing existing uses of QR codes for education at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing existing uses of QR codes for education at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing existing uses of QR codes for education at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing existing uses of QR codes for education at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing existing uses of QR codes for education at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing existing uses of QR codes for education at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing existing uses of QR codes for education at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in using QR generation software in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in using QR generation software in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in using QR generation software n meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in using QR generation software in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using QR generation software in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using QR generation software in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using QR generation software in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a QR code activity at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of  a QR code activity at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of  a QR code activity of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of  a QR code activity of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of  a QR code activity of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of  a QR code activity of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of  a QR code activity of significantly unsatisfactory quality.



AR Site Based Educational Activity


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR educational activities at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  educational activities at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  educational activities at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR educational activities at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  educational activities at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  educational activities at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability iof location based AR educational activities at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  technologies at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  technologies at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR technologies at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  technologies at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability of location based AR  technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability iof location based AR technologies at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using location based AR software at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using location based AR software at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using location based AR software at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using location based AR software at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using location based AR software tandard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using location based AR software at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using location based AR software at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in modifying an educational activity at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in modifying an educational activity  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in modifying an educational activity  at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in modifying an educational activity  at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using modifying an educational activity  at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in modifying an educational activity at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in modifying an educational activity at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a location based AR educational activity of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a location based AR educational activity of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a location based AR educational activity of good quality. Articulation and presentation of a location based AR educational activity of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of a location based AR educational activity of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of a location based AR educational activity of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a location based AR educational activity of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.



Machimina Tour


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing the educational uses of machnimina at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the educational uses of machnimina at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the educational uses of machnimina at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing the educational uses of machnimina at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing the educational uses of machnimina at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing the educational uses of machnimina at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing the educational uses of machnimina at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in using screen recording and video editing software to explain concepts at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in using screen recording and video editing software to explain concepts at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in using screen recording and video editing software to explain concepts t a good standard.Interpretive ability in using screen recording and video editing software to explain concepts at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using screen recording and video editing software to explain concepts at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using screen recording and video editing software to explain concepts at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using screen recording and video editing software to explain concepts t a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an educational machimina at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational machimina at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational machimina of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of an educational machimina of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational machimina of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an educational machimina of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an educational machimina of significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Virtual World build


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing educational uses of virtual worlds at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing educational uses of virtual worlds at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing educational uses of virtual worlds at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing educational uses of virtual worlds at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing educational uses of virtual worlds at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing educational uses of virtual worlds at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing educational uses of virtual worlds at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in developing VW content that is educationally meaningful  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in developing VW content that is educationally meaningful  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in developing VW content that is educationally meaningful  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability developing VW content that is educationally meaningful  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in developing VW content that is educationally meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in developing VW content that is educationally meaningful  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in developing VW content that is educationally eaningful  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in describing educational activities possible at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in describing educational activities possible at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in describing educational activities possible at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in describing educational activities possible at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in describing educational activities possible at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in describing educational activities possible at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in describing educational activities possible at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in creating objects and locations an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in creating objects and locations  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in creating objects and locations at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in creating objects and locations at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in creating objects and locations at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in creating objects and locations at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in creating objects and locations at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of an explanatory video of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and  presentation of an explanatory video of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of an explanatory video of good quality. Articulation and presentation of an explanatory video of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of an explanatory video of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of an explanatory video of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of an explanatory video of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Camp-on-a-Disk


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing the use of Robotics to achieve educational outcomes at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the use of Robotics to achieve educational outcomes at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing the use of Robotics to achieve educational outcomes at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing the use of Robotics to achieve educational outcomes at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing the use of Robotics to achieve educational outcomes at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing the use of Robotics to achieve educational outcomes at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing the use of Robotics to achieve educational outcomes at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in integrating a series of activities in meaningful ways to produce a thematic unit at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in integrating a series of activities in meaningful ways to produce a thematic uniat a very high standard.Interpretive ability in integrating a series of activities in meaningful ways to produce a thematic uniat a good standard.Interpretive ability in integrating a series of activities in meaningful ways  to produce a thematic uniat a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating a series of activities in meaningful ways to produce a thematic uniat unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating a series of activities in meaningful ways to produce a thematic uniat unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in integrating a series of activities in meaningful ways to produce a thematic uniat a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a thematic unit description and resources at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of  a thematic unit description and resources at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of  a thematic unit description and resources of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of  a thematic unit description and resources of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of  a thematic unit description and resources of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of  a thematic unit description and resources of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a thematic unit description and resources of significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Electronic Solution


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing automation technologies at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing automation technologies at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing automation technologies at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing automation technologies at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing automation technologies at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in analysing automation technologies at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability inanalysing I automation technologies at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing an education application  in meaningful ways  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing an education application  in meaningful ways  at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing an education application in meaningful ways  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing an education application in meaningful ways  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in idetailing an education application in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing an education application  in meaningful ways  at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing an education application in meaningful ways  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in developing an innovative solution at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative  in developing an innovative solution at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative  in developing an innovative solution at  a good standard.Intellectual initiative  in developing an innovative solution at   satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative  in developing an innovative solution at  an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative  in developing an innovative solution at  anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative  in developing an innovative solution at  a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using automation technology to solve a problem at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using automation technology to solve a problem at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using automation technology to solve a problem at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using automation technology to solve a problem at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using automation technology to solve a problem at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using automation technology to solve a problem at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using automation technology to solve a problem at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a solution using automation technologies of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a solution using automation technologies  of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a solution using automation technologies  of good quality. Articulation and presentation of a solution using automation technologies  of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of a solution using automation technologies  of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of a solution using automation technologies  of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a solution using automation technologies  of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Create an animated story or claymation


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75       3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Analytical ability in analysing an educational concept and creating a digital story to explain the concept at an exceptionally high standard.Analytical ability in analysing an educational concept and creating a digital story to explain the concept at a very high standard.Analytical ability in analysing an educational concept and creating a digital story to explain the concept at a good standard. Analytical ability in analysing an educational concept and creating a digital story to explain the concept at a satisfactory standard.  Analytical ability in analysing an educational concept and creating a digital story to explain the concept at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Analytical ability in analysing an educational concept and creating a digital story to explain the concept  at unsatisfactory standard.Analytical ability inanalysing an educational concept and creating a digital story to explain the concept  at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive ability in using digital storytelling techniques in meaningful ways at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive  ability in using digital storytelling techniques in meaningful ways at a very high standard.Interpretive ability in using digital storytelling techniques in meaningful ways at a good standard.Interpretive ability in using digital storytelling techniques in meaningful ways at a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using digital storytelling techniques in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using digital storytelling techniques in meaningful ways at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive ability in using digital storytelling techniques in meaningful ways at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of a digital story at exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital story at  very high quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital story of a good quality. Articulation and presentation of a digital story of a standard quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital story of unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of a digital story of unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of a digital story of significantly unsatisfactory quality.


Educational Programming


 Outstanding Very High High Satisfactory Close Fail Fail Abject Fail
 15 - 12.75 12.74 -11.25 11.24 - 9.75 9.74 - 7.50  7.49 - 6.75 6.74 - 3.75         3.74 - 0.00
 100% - 85%         84% - 75% 74% - 65% 64% - 50% 49% - 45% 44% - 25% 24% - 0%
Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing a problem to be solved at an exceptionally high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing a problem to be solved at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing a problem to be solved at a good standard. Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing a problem to be solved at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing a problem to be solved at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in detailing a problem to be solved at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in adetailing a problem to be solved at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in describing student learning and how this will be assessed  at an exceptionally high standard.
Interpretive and analytical ability in describing student learning and how this will be assessed at a very high standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in describing student learning and how this will be assessed  at a good standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in describing student learning and how this will be assessed  at a satisfactory standard.  Interpretive and analytical ability in describing student learning and how this will be assessed  at unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in describing student learning and how this will be assessed at unsatisfactory standard.Interpretive and analytical ability in describing student learning and how this will be assessed at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using a programming language to solve a problem at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using a programming language to solve a problem at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using a programming language to solve a problem at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using a programming language to solve a problem at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using a programming language to solve a problem at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using a programming language to solve a problem at anunsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using a programming language to solve a problem at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Intellectual initiative in using programming to engage and challenge students at an exceptionally high standard.Intellectual initiative in using programming to engage and challenge students  at a very high standard.Intellectual initiative in using programming to engage and challenge students at a good standard.Intellectual initiative in using programming to engage and challenge students at a satisfactory standard.  Intellectual initiative in using programming to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard but close to a satisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using programming to engage and challenge students at an unsatisfactory standard.Intellectual initiative in using programming to engage and challenge students at a significantly unsatisfactory standard.
Articulation and presentation of documentation and screen recording of exceptionally high quality.Articulation and presentation of documentation and screen recording of very high quality.Articulation and presentation of documentation and screen recording of good quality. Articulation and presentation of documentation and screen recording of standard quality.Articulation and presentation of documentation and screen recording of  unsatisfactory quality but close to a satisfactory standard.Articulation and presentation of documentation and screen recording of  unsatisfactory quality.Articulation and presentation of documentation and screen recording of  significantly unsatisfactory quality.








Comments